Yamaha XJR1300 vs Suzuki Bandit 1250

The Yamaha XJR1300 is more powerful and lighter than the Suzuki Bandit 1250. The Yamaha XJR1300 produces 98 hp (73 kW). Both are large-displacement naked motorcycles with closely matched output, and neither has a meaningful capacity edge. The Yamaha’s lower seat and lower wet weight may make it easier to manage at a standstill, while the Suzuki offers a similar overall performance profile. The choice comes down to whether those practical differences match your priorities.

Yamaha XJR1300

Yamaha

Yamaha XJR1300

Data: Yamaha XJR1300, 2018

View motorcycle
Suzuki GSX 1250FA

Suzuki

Suzuki Bandit 1250

Data: Suzuki GSX 1250FA, 2018

View motorcycle

Yamaha XJR1300 vs Suzuki Bandit 1250: specifications

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
Engine capacity1,251 cm³1,255 cm³
Power98 hp (73 kW) — Favorable value97 hp (72 kW)
Wet weight245 kg — Favorable value257 kg
Seat height795 mm805 mm
Fuel capacity21 L — Favorable value19 L

Percentages use the second model as the baseline. Highlighting applies only to comparable power, torque, mass and fuel capacity; it does not predict handling or acceleration.

Engine

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
Engine capacity1,251 cm³1,255 cm³
Power98 hp (73 kW) — Favorable value97 hp (72 kW)
Torque108.4 Nm — Favorable value108 Nm
Engine typeIn-line four, four-strokeIn-line four, four-stroke
Bore × stroke79.0 x 63.8 mm79.0 x 64.0 mm
Compression ratio9.7:110.5:1
CoolingAirLiquid
Fuel systemInjectionInjection
StartingElectricElectric

Transmission

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
GearboxManual 5-speedManual 6-speed
ClutchWet, multiple-disc coil springHydraulic clutch with coil springs
Final driveChainChain

Dimensions and weight

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
Wet weight245 kg — Favorable value257 kg
Seat height795 mm805 mm
Length2,175 mm2,130 mm
Width765 mm790 mm
Height1,120 mm1,245 mm
Wheelbase1,500 mm1,485 mm
Ground clearance125 mm135 mm
Fuel capacity21 L — Favorable value19 L

Chassis

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
FrameSteel double cradleClassic tube-frame chassis
Front suspensionTelescopic forks.Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped
Rear suspensionSwingarm. Öhlins.Link type, coil spring, oil damped
Rake25.0°25.6°
Trail100 mm104 mm

Brakes

Specifications side by sideYamaha XJR1300Model year 2018Suzuki Bandit 1250Model year 2018
Front brakesDouble disc. HydraulicDouble disc. Digital ABS
Rear brakesSingle disc. HydraulicSingle disc. Digital ABS
Front brake diameter298 mm310 mm
Rear brake diameter267 mm240 mm
Front tire120/70-ZR17120/70-ZR17
Rear tire180/55-ZR17180/55-ZR17

Key differences

This comparison uses Yamaha XJR1300 from 2018 and Suzuki Bandit 1250 from 2018.

Power

Yamaha XJR1300

98 hp (73 kW)

Highlighted value

Suzuki Bandit 1250

97 hp (72 kW)

+1%

Wet weight

Yamaha XJR1300

245 kg

Highlighted value

Suzuki Bandit 1250

257 kg

−5%

Engine capacity

Yamaha XJR1300

1,251 cm³

Suzuki Bandit 1250

1,255 cm³

−0%

Torque

Yamaha XJR1300

108.4 Nm

Highlighted value

Suzuki Bandit 1250

108 Nm

+0%

Seat height

Yamaha XJR1300

795 mm

Highlighted value

Suzuki Bandit 1250

805 mm

−1%

Yamaha XJR1300 vs Suzuki Bandit 1250: which one to choose?

  • Choose Yamaha XJR1300 if easier pushing and parking in city use matters; its comparable wet weight is lower by 12 kg.
  • Choose Yamaha XJR1300 if reaching the ground matters; its seat is lower by 10 mm.

FAQ

Which motorcycle has more power?
The Yamaha XJR1300 is more powerful, with 98 hp (73 kW) versus 97 hp (72 kW) for the Suzuki Bandit 1250.
Which motorcycle weighs less?
The Yamaha XJR1300 has the lower wet weight, at 245 kg versus 257 kg for the Suzuki Bandit 1250.
Which motorcycle has the lower seat?
The Yamaha XJR1300 has the lower seat at 795 mm, compared with 805 mm for the Suzuki Bandit 1250.

Explore both models

Related comparisons