Yamaha MT-07 vs Yamaha XSR700
The Yamaha XSR700 is more powerful, while the Yamaha MT-07 has the lower seat; they are very close in specifications. The Yamaha XSR700 produces 75 hp (56 kW), and the Yamaha MT-07’s seat is lower by 10 mm. Their shared engine capacity, wet-weight basis, and equal tank capacity keep the practical distinction narrow: the Yamaha MT-07 offers the lower seating position, while the Yamaha XSR700 holds a small power edge. These are the clearest differences to weigh when comparing the two.


Yamaha MT-07 vs Yamaha XSR700: specifications
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine capacity | 689 cm³ | 689 cm³ |
| Power | 74 hp (55 kW) | 75 hp (56 kW) — Favorable value |
| Wet weight | 179 kg — Favorable value | 186 kg |
| Seat height | 805 mm | 815 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 14 L | 14 L |
Percentages use the second model as the baseline. Highlighting applies only to comparable power, torque, mass and fuel capacity; it does not predict handling or acceleration.
Engine
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine capacity | 689 cm³ | 689 cm³ |
| Power | 74 hp (55 kW) | 75 hp (56 kW) — Favorable value |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Engine type | Parallel Twin, four-stroke | Parallel Twin, four-stroke |
| Bore × stroke | 80.0 x 68.6 mm | 80.0 x 68.6 mm |
| Compression ratio | 11.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Valves per cylinder | 4 | 4 |
| Cooling | Liquid | Liquid |
| Fuel system | Injection | Injection |
| Starting | Electric | Electric |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km | 4.3 L/100 km |
Transmission
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Gearbox | Manual 6-speed | Manual 6-speed |
| Clutch | Wet, Multiple Disc | Wet, Multiple Disc |
| Final drive | Chain | Chain |
Dimensions and weight
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Wet weight | 179 kg — Favorable value | 186 kg |
| Seat height | 805 mm | 815 mm |
| Length | 2,085 mm | 2,075 mm |
| Width | 745 mm | 820 mm |
| Height | 1,090 mm | 1,130 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,400 mm | 1,405 mm |
| Ground clearance | 140 mm | 140 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 14 L | 14 L |
Chassis
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Frame | Diamond | Diamond |
| Front suspension | Telescopic forks | Telescopic forks |
| Rear suspension | Swingarm, (Link type suspension) | Link suspension |
| Front wheel travel | 137 mm | 137 mm |
| Rear wheel travel | 130 mm | 130 mm |
| Rake | 24.0° | 24.0° |
| Trail | 90 mm | 90 mm |
Brakes
| Specifications side by side | Yamaha MT-07Model year 2017 | Yamaha XSR700Model year 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic. ABS. | Double disc. Hydraulic. ABS. |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. ABS. | Single disc. Hydraulic. ABS. |
| Front brake diameter | 282 mm | 282 mm |
| Rear brake diameter | 245 mm | 245 mm |
| Front tire | 120/70-ZR17 | 120/70-ZR17 |
| Rear tire | 180/55-ZR17 | 180/55-ZR17 |
| ABS | Yes | Yes |
Key differences
This comparison uses Yamaha MT-07 from 2017 and Yamaha XSR700 from 2017.
Power
Yamaha MT-07
74 hp (55 kW)
Yamaha XSR700
75 hp (56 kW)
Highlighted valueWet weight
Yamaha MT-07
179 kg
Highlighted valueYamaha XSR700
186 kg
Engine capacity
Yamaha MT-07
689 cm³
Yamaha XSR700
689 cm³
Torque
Yamaha MT-07
68 Nm
Yamaha XSR700
68 Nm
Seat height
Yamaha MT-07
805 mm
Highlighted valueYamaha XSR700
815 mm
Yamaha MT-07 vs Yamaha XSR700: which one to choose?
These models are very close in specifications.
- The Yamaha MT-07 has a 10 mm lower seat.
- The Yamaha XSR700 produces 75 hp (56 kW), giving it a small power edge over the Yamaha MT-07.
FAQ
- Which motorcycle has the lower seat?
- The Yamaha MT-07 has the lower seat at 805 mm, compared with 815 mm on the Yamaha XSR700.
- Do they have the same fuel consumption?
- Yes; both have a stated consumption of 4.3 L/100 km.
- Which has the larger fuel tank?
- Neither: both have a 14 L tank.